y separately published work icon Senses of Cinema periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2024... no. 111 November 2024 of Senses of Cinema est. 1999 Senses of Cinema
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Dear Readers: welcome to Issue 111 of Senses of Cinema, a journal in which the serious and eclectic discussion of moving images past, present, and future never dies, no matter the historical ruptures all around us.

'We open with a special 13-text dossier that is sure to become a touchstone for researchers, students, cinephiles, and enthusiasts of all sorts in the future. Guest edited by Adrian Danks and Olympia Szilagyi with editorial assistance from Digby Houghton, “‘A very open-ended canon’: The Many Histories of the Melbourne Cinémathèque” pays tribute to (and diligently historicizes) the eponymous film society, a pivotal institution in Melbourne and Australian cinemagoing culture. As Danks notes in his succinct introduction, the dossier offers “only a partial and proudly parochial account of this history,” leaving vast amounts of the Cinémathèque’s 75-year life untouched. Yet the reader – Melbourne-based or not – is left with the distinct and deep impression of the inexhaustible vibrancy of an organisation dependent not just on films, but especially on people: the members without which cinema is just a dark room full of dusty seats.' (Production summary) 

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2024 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
From Joseph Losey’s M to Jeni Thornley’s Island Home Country : The Melbourne Cinémathèque and Australian Film Culture, Adrian Danks , single work criticism

'You have to adapt and remain the same. The Melbourne Cinémathèque is one of Australia’s longest-running film culture organisations, preceded by only a couple of years by the State Film Centre of Victoria (now ACMI) and the Hobart Film Society in Tasmania (now operating on a very diminished scale). It started operations as the Melbourne University Film Society (MUFS) in 1948, held its first screening, Sergei Eisenstein’s then recently unbanned Bronenosets Potyomkin (Battleship Potemkin, 1925) in early March 1949, before becoming the Melbourne Cinémathèque in 1984. As Kirsten Stevens, Barrett Hodsdon and I have argued– mine a chapter on MUFS in the 1960s published in the book, Go! Melbourne in the Sixties – it was also central to the development of the Melbourne Film Festival, running its own festival from 1949 and integral to saving the wider organisation in 1954. At its mid-1960s peak, MUFS was the University of Melbourne’s largest club, boasting around 2000 members. It gave opportunities to figures who went on to have significant roles in the broader film and cultural industries such as Gil Brealey, Barry Humphries (who was “publicity agent” in 1952), Jack Hibberd, Robin Laurie, Brian Davies and Alan Finney – and many who didn’t. A key shift to trace across these subsequent decades might be that many of the key Cinémathèque figures now go onto curatorial careers (reflective of the broader compartmentalisation of screen culture). Like many such organisations, it has sometimes been taken for granted, marginalised and written out of broader histories of cinema in Australia. But it has also been a bellwether for film culture in Melbourne that can tell us much about the wider economy of cinema.' (Introduction) 

Friends, Strangers, and the Night : The Filmmakers Lurking in the Dark of the Cinémathèque, Andréas Giannopoulos , single work criticism

'In his account of the Melbourne University Film Society’s (MUFS) activities in the 1960s, Adrian Danks highlights the organisation’s facilitation of feature-film production. Through the help of the dedicated “Uni-Fed” fund and other sources, its members translated the paradigms of the nouvelle vague and auteurism – that they were promoting and developing through their critical writing and programming activity – into a local practice. The notable figures of this era who went onto to varied careers in the film industry include Peter Carmody, Lloyd Carrick, Alan Finney and Antony I. Ginnane. (Introduction)

From the Union Theatre to the Glasshouse and Beyond : Exploring One of Melbourne Film Culture’s Pivotal Transitions, Digby Houghton , single work criticism

'His name plagues me. Everywhere I go I can hear it. Whenever I ask somebody for information pertaining to the Melbourne Cinémathèque, it’s not long before his name pops up again. Although a dentist by trade, Michael Koller has been central to keeping one of the longest running film societies in Australia alive for 50 years. Since the start of his involvement in 1974, Koller has seen the organisation transition: from its celebrated status as the Melbourne University Film Society (MUFS) to the Melbourne Cinémathèque in 1984. He has also witnessed its shift from the Union Theatre and various other smaller spaces at the University of Melbourne to the Glasshouse Theatre (now known as the Kaleide Theatre) at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT; 1984-1992), from the Treasury Theatre (State Film Theatre; 1993-2002) run by the State Film Centre and Cinemedia to its current home at ACMI in Federation Square (from late 2002 onwards, with a couple of years at the Capitol Theatre during ACMI’s renovation and the COVID pandemic). This article explores the period immediately before the foundation of the Cinémathèque as well its formative decade spent at RMIT. Focusing on the rich film culture of the 1980s and early 1990s, and drawing on a small selection ephemeral archive material, it contextualises the Cinémathèque’s program and considers its importance to Melbournians then and now. It draws on discussions with three key figures in the organisation: Adrian Danks (co-curator and president), Michael Koller (co-curator and executive programmer) and Marg Irwin (one-time committee member, treasurer and public officer).' (Introduction) 

Pushing the Envelope, Peter Hourigan , single work criticism

'Undergraduate years are full of the excitement and wonder of working out where you are in your life. In undertaking your course studies, you are planning for your future, but with other activities, such as belonging to a student club, you are not thinking about its lasting impact. Yet, for me, my involvement with the Melbourne University Film Society (MUFS) had a larger, formative influence on the rest of my life. At the time, I wasn’t aware that this was an incredibly significant period in the evolution of cinephilia in Melbourne and across Australia.' (Introduction) 

A Potted, Semi-Reliable Account of “27” Years of Cinémathèquing, Cerise Howard , single work criticism

'Somewhere at home I’ve squirreled away Melbourne Cinémathèque calendars dating back to 1999 – though this was not my sporadic first year of attendance, which was, I think, in 1997. Rather, 1999 was the first year I decorated a spot on the wall of a particular share house with one of these calendars, cueing me into attending thereafter with some regularity. For the years 1999-2007, that wall was in the bathroom of a tumbledown terrace house in Fitzroy which increasingly admitted indoors more and more of the great outdoors, accounting for the enduringly mildewy condition of several years’ worth of calendars. Nevertheless, they are prized possessions!' (Introduction) 

Happy 40th (and 75th) Birthday, Dear Cinémathèque, John Hughes , single work criticism
How to Tell People About a Film Society, Dylan Rainforth , single work criticism

'In the beginning was… a whole year’s program, baldly listed as film titles and screening dates, tightly laid out in three columns on an A5 card.'  (Introduction)

From MUFS to the Melbourne Cinémathèque : Our Evolving Journey Through Cinema Part I, Michael Koller , single work criticism

'In the early 1970s, major Hollywood films were generally released within a relatively short worldwide window, while many non-English language and arthouse films could take years to get to Australia. There was no streaming, no DVDs or videos, no cable television. Occasionally there were one-off screenings, usually matinees on weekends, and, of course, films screened regularly on TV. The premiere television screenings were usually on a Sunday night, and there were midday movies every day. Some film societies screened monthly (I joined one such organisation, the Mordialloc Film Society aged 16, with my friend Peter Nagels), and the Melbourne Film Festival (MFF) screened for two weeks around the Queen’s Birthday weekend. MFF screened two feature films a night, with a few more titles showing on the weekend. There were no other film festivals in Victoria at this time. MFF had a copyright on the name and no one else was permitted to use the film festival moniker.' (Introduction) 

Opening the Archive, Eloise Ross , single work criticism

'A book I bought earlier this year at the Il Cinema Ritrovato Book Fair in Bologna – a haven for cinephiles accompanying an annual festival that celebrates film history and that is a place of inspiration for academics, curators, historians and film lovers of all kinds – that defines “film curatorship” as “[t]he art of interpreting the aesthetics, history, and technology of cinema through the selective collection, preservation, and documentation of films and their exhibition in archival presentations.' (Introduction) 

Who Commenced It : Starting Out at the Cinémathèque, Jake Wilson , single work criticism

'I’ve never kept a viewing diary, as I know many cinephiles do. But to some extent the Melbourne Cinémathèque has kept one for me. Browsing through some of their old calendars recently, I found I was usually able to remember which screenings I was present at, even when I couldn’t remember much about the films themselves.' (Introduction) 

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 5 Dec 2024 11:10:45
X