The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
Latest Issues
AbstractHistoryArchive Description
A column relating to the legal action taken on behalf of Edward O'Shaughnessy. The action arose from a column written by John Dunmore Lang in which he argued that no person 'who has been transported for a felony, but who subsequently obtained his freedom, is a fit person to have the management of the Press in a convict colony'.
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Works about this Work
-
Our Libel Cause
1835
single work
column
— Appears in: The Sydney Monitor , 1 July vol. 10 no. 807 1835; (p. 2) The writer for the Sydney Monitor (almost certainly Edward Smith Hall) comments on the libel case being brought by Edward O'Shaughnessy against the Rev'd John Dunmore Lang. While agreeing with Lang that 'no person 'who has been transported for a felony, but who subsequently obtained his freedom, is a fit person to have the management of the Press in a convict colony', Hall disapproves of the language Lang used against O'Shaughnessy, stating: 'But the way in which Dr. Lang has represented the affair, has been slanderous and malicious in the extreme, and we sincerely hope such a flagrant breach of the laws of libel will be fairly tried, and that in the administration of public justice, the law will prove itself to be blind, and not appear to make an offence the less, because committed by a clergyman. We should not have felt justified in making these remarks, but for the above paragraph [the Monitor has quoted from the Colonist] of Dr. Lang's newspaper. But we shall not allow the Dr. to influence the coming trial by his criticisms, without correcting his articles on the subject, from time to time, as they may be published.'
-
Our Libel Cause
1835
single work
column
— Appears in: The Sydney Monitor , 1 July vol. 10 no. 807 1835; (p. 2) The writer for the Sydney Monitor (almost certainly Edward Smith Hall) comments on the libel case being brought by Edward O'Shaughnessy against the Rev'd John Dunmore Lang. While agreeing with Lang that 'no person 'who has been transported for a felony, but who subsequently obtained his freedom, is a fit person to have the management of the Press in a convict colony', Hall disapproves of the language Lang used against O'Shaughnessy, stating: 'But the way in which Dr. Lang has represented the affair, has been slanderous and malicious in the extreme, and we sincerely hope such a flagrant breach of the laws of libel will be fairly tried, and that in the administration of public justice, the law will prove itself to be blind, and not appear to make an offence the less, because committed by a clergyman. We should not have felt justified in making these remarks, but for the above paragraph [the Monitor has quoted from the Colonist] of Dr. Lang's newspaper. But we shall not allow the Dr. to influence the coming trial by his criticisms, without correcting his articles on the subject, from time to time, as they may be published.'
Last amended 23 Sep 2011 16:44:09
Export this record
