Note: Published without author attribution; authorship acknowledged following 'an application for a criminal information'. See the Colonist, 11 June 1835.
Issue Details: First known date: 1835... 1835 The Literary Profession, or, The Colonial Press
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

The writer for the Colonist disapproves of Edward O'Shaughnessy's role as editor of the Sydney Gazette. The writer argues that 'there are certain situations of importance to the public in the colony which an emancipist cannot hold, however throroughly reformed he may be, and however irreproachable his subsequent conduct'. Even leaving aside the moral grounds of O'Shaughnessy's appointment as editor, the Colonist declares that the ex-convict is 'quite destitute of the talent and vigour of mind which are indispensably necessary in such an office'.

The writer for the Colonist also reflects on the general low tone of colonial newspapers and hopes that a more properly qualified person may emigrate from England to take up an editorial role and raise the standard of New South Wales newspapers.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon The Colonist vol. 1 no. 14 2 April 1835 Z1807232 1835 newspaper issue 1835 pg. 105-107

Works about this Work

Matter Furnished by Our Reporters and Correspondents : Supreme Court : Civil Side 1835 single work column
— Appears in: The Sydney Monitor , 17 June vol. 10 no. 803 1835; (p. 2-3)

'In this case a rule Nisi had been obtained, calling on Dr. Lang to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against him for a libel published in the fourteenth number of the Colonist.' (The article in question is 'The Literary Profession, or, The Colonial Press'.)

The court came to the decision that there was sufficient evidence for a criminal information to be filed.

Our Libel Case 1835 single work column
— Appears in: The Colonist , 11 June vol. 1 no. 24 1835; (p. 188)
A column relating to the legal action taken on behalf of Edward O'Shaughnessy. The action arose from a column written by John Dunmore Lang in which he argued that no person 'who has been transported for a felony, but who subsequently obtained his freedom, is a fit person to have the management of the Press in a convict colony'.
Our Libel Case 1835 single work column
— Appears in: The Colonist , 11 June vol. 1 no. 24 1835; (p. 188)
A column relating to the legal action taken on behalf of Edward O'Shaughnessy. The action arose from a column written by John Dunmore Lang in which he argued that no person 'who has been transported for a felony, but who subsequently obtained his freedom, is a fit person to have the management of the Press in a convict colony'.
Matter Furnished by Our Reporters and Correspondents : Supreme Court : Civil Side 1835 single work column
— Appears in: The Sydney Monitor , 17 June vol. 10 no. 803 1835; (p. 2-3)

'In this case a rule Nisi had been obtained, calling on Dr. Lang to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against him for a libel published in the fourteenth number of the Colonist.' (The article in question is 'The Literary Profession, or, The Colonial Press'.)

The court came to the decision that there was sufficient evidence for a criminal information to be filed.

Last amended 23 Sep 2011 16:37:04
105-107 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article31716373 The Literary Profession, or, The Colonial Presssmall AustLit logo The Colonist
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X