ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 2009... 2009 ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'In Australian Humanities Review 45 Guy Redden draws upon his experience with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the UK to warn Australian researchers of various dangers posed by the implementation of similar methods of evaluation that may be introduced under the banner of Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). Redden is concerned with the tendency of emerging forms of research evaluation to privilege a small number of 'high ranking' journals, and of the distorting effect this has on research communication as authors obsessively target these journals. This in turn results in research funding being concentrated on a small number of institutions and research units that are (predictably) assessed as high-achievers.'

Notes

  • Contains ERA journal rankings for Cluster 2, Humanities and Creative Arts.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()
Last amended 6 Aug 2010 14:15:11
http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-10116-20100522-0000-epress.anu.edu.au/ahr/046/pdf/essay01.pdf ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journalssmall AustLit logo Australian Humanities Review
Subjects:
  • Research, Lower Plenty - Eltham area, Melbourne - Northeast, Melbourne, Victoria,
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X