y separately published work icon New Literatures Review periodical  
Alternative title: New Literature Review
Issue Details: First known date: 1975... 1975 New Literatures Review
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

  • 2 issues per annum
  • With title: New Literature Review Nos. 1-15, 1975-1988
  • Offers insight into post-colonial literatures, especially using comparative approaches and applications of literary theory.
  • Contents indexed selectively.

  • Indexed comprehensively until 2009. Due to resourcing issues, this periodical will no longer be comprehensively indexed.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

First known date: 1975
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()

Works about this Work

ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals Paul Genoni , Gaby Haddow , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Humanities Review , May no. 46 2009; 'In Australian Humanities Review 45 Guy Redden draws upon his experience with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the UK to warn Australian researchers of various dangers posed by the implementation of similar methods of evaluation that may be introduced under the banner of Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). Redden is concerned with the tendency of emerging forms of research evaluation to privilege a small number of 'high ranking' journals, and of the distorting effect this has on research communication as authors obsessively target these journals. This in turn results in research funding being concentrated on a small number of institutions and research units that are (predictably) assessed as high-achievers.'
ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals Paul Genoni , Gaby Haddow , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Humanities Review , May no. 46 2009; 'In Australian Humanities Review 45 Guy Redden draws upon his experience with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the UK to warn Australian researchers of various dangers posed by the implementation of similar methods of evaluation that may be introduced under the banner of Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). Redden is concerned with the tendency of emerging forms of research evaluation to privilege a small number of 'high ranking' journals, and of the distorting effect this has on research communication as authors obsessively target these journals. This in turn results in research funding being concentrated on a small number of institutions and research units that are (predictably) assessed as high-achievers.'
VIEW ALL WORKS ABOUT (1)

PeriodicalNewspaper Details

ISSN: 0314-7495
ISSN: 1442-8172
Last amended 16 Apr 2020 08:39:40
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X