Sentences of Guilt for Parents single work   column  
Issue Details: First known date: 2008... 2008 Sentences of Guilt for Parents
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

Miranda Devine attacks Paul Jennings's opinion (as aired on ABC Radio National in March 2008) that children can learn to read through exposure to literature, for instance by being read to by their parents. Devine sees the 'whole word' teaching method as a manifestation of 'a type of left-wing ideology, which permeates the education industry'.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

Well-Loved Books Judith Ridge , 2008 single work correspondence
— Appears in: The Sydney Morning Herald , 21-23 March 2008; (p. 30)
Judith Ridge responds to Miranda Devine's assertion that Paul Jennings and Mem Fox are 'megabucks children's authors' due to the 'enthusiastic endorsement of the educational establishment'. Ridge declares that Devine's assertion is 'as absurd as it is uninformed'.
Well-Loved Books Judith Ridge , 2008 single work correspondence
— Appears in: The Sydney Morning Herald , 21-23 March 2008; (p. 30)
Judith Ridge responds to Miranda Devine's assertion that Paul Jennings and Mem Fox are 'megabucks children's authors' due to the 'enthusiastic endorsement of the educational establishment'. Ridge declares that Devine's assertion is 'as absurd as it is uninformed'.
Last amended 26 Mar 2008 12:39:01
17 Sentences of Guilt for Parentssmall AustLit logo The Sydney Morning Herald
X