y separately published work icon First Fruits of Australian Poetry selected work   poetry  
Issue Details: First known date: 1819... 1819 First Fruits of Australian Poetry
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

Contents

* Contents derived from the Sydney, New South Wales,:R. Howe , 1823 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Botany-Bay Flowersi"God of this planet! for that name best fits", Barron Field , single work poetry
The Kangaroo Kangarooi"Kangaroo! Kangaroo!", Barron Field , single work poetry
On Reading the Controversy Between Lord Byron and Mr Bowlesi"Whether a ship's poetic? - Bowles would own,", Barron Field , single work poetry
On Affixing a Tablet to the Memory of Captain Cook, and Sir Joseph Banks, Against the Rock of Their First Landing in Botany Bayi"I have been musing what our Banks had said,", Barron Field , single work poetry
On Visiting the Spot Where Captain Cook, and Sir Joseph Banks, First Landed in Botany Bayi"Here fix the tablet:-This must be the place", Barron Field , single work poetry

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

Two Postscripts to Barron Field in New South Wales : The Resurrection and the Great Seal Thomas H. Ford , Justin Clemens , 2024 single work essay
— Appears in: Cordite Poetry Review , 13 May no. 112 2024;

'Barron Field was, as we argued in our recent book Barron Field in New South Wales, responsible for the first volume of poetry published in Australia – a status flaunted in its title, First Fruits of Australian Poetry – and responsible also for the first articulation of the doctrine that later came to be known as terra nullius: that is, the foundational and genocidal legal fiction under which Australia was colonised by the British on the basis of its being previously uninhabited: i.e., that Aboriginal people, at least in the eyes of the law, simply didn’t exist, and, as not existing de jure, could be handled so as to become equally inexistent de facto. Our book examined what these two notable firsts had to do with each other. We claimed that it was no coincidence that the first Australian poet – the first person to have laid claim to that title, and indeed to have invented that category – was also the first legislator of terra nullius. Through close readings of the six poems that made up Field’s book from its second edition in 1823 – the first edition of 1819 contained just two poems – we argued that, far from being merely supplemental to his legal reformulation of the basis of colonisation, poetry was in fact instrumental to Field’s program to re-establish New South Wales on a new constitutional footing premised counterfactually on the non-existence of Aboriginal societies. To revert to a famous tag by Percy Shelley to which we paid considerable attention in the book: this poet really was the unacknowledged legislator of white Australia. In this foundational moment, the liberal colonial regime that underpinned future national development was poetic, we claimed, in inspiration, design and operation.'  (Introduction)

y separately published work icon Barron Field in New South Wales : The Poetics of Terra Nullius Thomas H. Ford , Justin Clemens , Melbourne : Melbourne University Press , 2023 25544651 2023 single work biography

'What does the first poetry in Australia, written by the Judge who declared the land terra nullius, tell us about the singular nature of colonialism here?

'On 24 February 1817, Barron Field sailed into Sydney Harbour on the convict transport Lord Melville to a ceremonial thirteen-gun salute. He was there as the new Judge of the Supreme Court of Civil Judicature in New South Wales - the highest legal authority in the turbulent colony. Energetic and gregarious, Field immediately set about impressing his vision of a future Australia as a liberal and prosperous nation. He courted the colony's leading figures, engaged in scientific research and even founded Australia's first bank. He also wrote poetry: in 1819, he published First Fruits of Australian Poetry, the first book of poems ever printed in the country. In England, Field had been the theatre critic for The Times, and a friend of such major Romantic writers as William Wordsworth, Charles Lamb and Leigh Hunt. In New South Wales, he saw the chance to become a major figure himself…' (Publication summary)

The Voice and the Canon Geordie Williamson , 2022 single work column
— Appears in: The Weekend Australian , 18 June 2022; (p. 17)

'Literature by Indigenous Australians - the voice from the heart - is the true core of the Australian canon, writes Geordie Williamson The ur-text of the Australian canon appeared just over two centuries ago, in 1819, when First Fruits of Australian Poetry by Barron Field, a Supreme Court judge of New South Wales with literary pretensions, was published in Sydney.' (Introduction)

First Fruits of a Barron Field Justin Clemens , 2019 single work criticism
— Appears in: Critical Quarterly , April vol. 61 no. 1 2019; (p. 18-36)

'In Australian literature, Barron Field is at once marginal and foundational. His usual claim to fame is that in 1819 he published the first book of poetry in Australia, a collection entitled First Fruits of Australian Poetry and comprised of two poems, which he then republished with four further poems in 1823. Notably, the book was self‐published using the official government printer, and bears on its title page the declaration ‘For Private Distribution’.' (Introduction)

Barron Field’s Terra Nullius Operation Thomas H. Ford , Justin Clemens , 2019 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Humanities Review , November no. 65 2019;
'Barron Field, who is today a largely forgotten figure, was from 1817 to 1824 the highest judge in New South Wales. His place in literary history rests on his First Fruits of Australian Poetry of 1819, which, as the title announces, was the first book of poetry to be published in this country. But by most accounts Field was a mediocre judge and a worse poet. John McLaren writes of the legal career that ‘Field’s record as a judge could best be described as mercurial, a reflection of his conservative belief system, a commitment to the culture of English law, and an opportunistic streak in his character…. Field’s counsel was not invariably sound or in keeping with the Colonial Office’s understanding of the legal proprieties’ (144). As for his poetry, even the colonial anthologists were wary of Field’s inclusion, although Vivian Smith has more recently been generous enough to judge Field’s poem ‘The Kangaroo’ to be ‘an exuberant oddity’ (74). Field also appears in a number of historical studies of colonial science and culture, where he tends however to remain a minor and rather ambiguous figure (Bernard Smith; Carter).' (Introduction)
The First Fruits of Australasian Poetry D. , 1821 single work review
— Appears in: New Monthly Magazine and Literary Journal , June vol. 1 no. 1821; (p. 682-686)

— Review of First Fruits of Australian Poetry Barron Field , 1819 selected work poetry
Review of Judge Field's Poetry 1826 single work review
— Appears in: Sydney Gazette, and New South Wales Advertiser , 25 November vol. 24 no. 1262 1826; (p. 3)

— Review of First Fruits of Australian Poetry Barron Field , 1819 selected work poetry
Untitled Charles Lamb , 1820 single work review
— Appears in: The Examiner , 16 January 1820; (p. 39-40)

— Review of First Fruits of Australian Poetry Barron Field , 1819 selected work poetry
Out of England : Literary Subjectivity in the Australian Colonies, 1788-1867 Simon During , 2004 single work criticism
— Appears in: Imagining Australia : Literature and Culture in the New New World 2004; (p. 3-21) Modern Australian Criticism and Theory 2010; (p. 61-72)
'...During traces the formation and transformation of 'modern literary subjectivity' in the distinctive conditions of nineteenth century Australia.' Source: Modern Australian Criticism and Theory (2010)
The Beginnings of Australian Poetry 1 : Editorial Notes Frederick T. Macartney , 1920 single work criticism
— Appears in: Birth : A Little Journal of Australian Poetry , October vol. 4 no. 47 1920; (p. 86-88)
Los primeros poetas Isidoro Castellanos Vega , 2006 single work criticism
— Appears in: Hontanar , November no. 92 2006; (p. 2-3)
Satirising White Australia in Christina Stead’s For Love Alone Lucinda O'Brien , 2012 single work criticism
— Appears in: JASAL , vol. 12 no. 1 2012;
'Christina Stead's For Love Alone is an iconic text in Australian literary studies, but until now, few critics have addressed the novel's treatment of colonialism and race relations. Feminist critics have played an important role in preserving Stead's reputation, and for this reason, most critical discussions of For Love Alone focus on its gender politics. This criticism generally regards Stead's protagonist, Teresa Hawkins, as a feminist heroine engaged in a struggle against patriarchy. This ideological approach is a valuable corrective to more autobiographical readings of For Love Alone, which treat the novel, rather reductively, as an account of Stead's personal experiences or as an expression of her 'private mythology'. Yet I argue that in taking Teresa for a heroine, feminist scholars do not sufficiently recognise Teresa's status as an object of satire. In this article, I highlight Stead's sharply satiric portrayal of Teresa as a narcissist, whose voyage of discovery ironically highlights her inability to learn or to change. I contend that Teresa's journey to London reveals her affinities with the regressive, racist ideology of her father and her love object, Jonathan Crow. In her self-appointed role as an 'Australian Ulysses', Teresa demonstrates the links between Australian nationalism, imperialism and racist ideologies. Without disputing the importance of feminist themes in the novel, I propose a new reading of For love alone as a complex work of postcolonial satire.' (Author's abstract)
Barron Field and the Translation of Romanticism to Colonial Australia A. D. Cousins , 1998 single work criticism biography
— Appears in: Southerly , Summer vol. 58 no. 4 1998-1999; (p. 157-174)
Cousins argues that Field's poetry should be read as an expression of the impossibility of imposing a Wordsworthian Romantic view on the Antipodes. Because Field cannot impose a Wordsworthian vision of nature on Australia, he replaces it with a ludic Romanticism that produces a vision of nature that is "paradoxical or hybrid".
Last amended 7 Oct 2014 16:48:45
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X