Steele Rudd as Failed Artist single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 1976... 1976 Steele Rudd as Failed Artist
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

Ikin argues that Rudd was not a mere bush yarner, but a writer with some artistic merit as seen in his careful construction of paragraphs and the combination of the 'hyperbole of everyday speech and the images that express an individual perception'. In effect, Rudd spins yarns which are precisely constructed and alien to the rough, loosely constructed form from which they derive. But, in conclusion, Ikin acknowledges that Rudd's creative skills were not up to the examination of psychology and ethics that his stories frequently touched.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Southerly vol. 36 no. 4 December 1976 Z596781 1976 periodical issue 1976 pg. 363-376
Last amended 26 May 2015 14:25:45
363-376 /austlit/page/0?nodeType=fullText&ftdir=4526091129205360536-10015&ftaid=C163467 Steele Rudd as Failed Artistsmall AustLit logo Southerly
Informit * Subscription service. Check your library.
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X