On Reading and Re-reading Patrick White single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 2014... 2014 On Reading and Re-reading Patrick White
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Few writers have received as much attention and have been so little understood as Patrick White, the only Australian to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. Critics have found his novels demanding and puzzling, and have been divided over the nature of his achievement. This essay points to the failure of critics to recognise the extent of the influence of Flaubert as well as that of the English modernists on White, and discusses the kind of attentiveness that his writing demands of the reader.' (Publication abstract)

Notes

  • Epigraph:

    ‘One learns to read White by re-reading his texts.’

    (Alan Lawson, introduction to Patrick White: Selected Writings, 1994)

    ‘with each re-reading of Joyce, or Woolf, or White, one realises, yet again that one has never been attentive enough, and that one never can be’

    (Charles Lock, ‘And Stood Breathing’)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 28 Nov 2014 12:42:38
212-230 On Reading and Re-reading Patrick Whitesmall AustLit logo The Cambridge Quarterly
Subjects:
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X