Director / Mother / Outlaw single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 2022... 2022 Director / Mother / Outlaw
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'This article examines the practices of Australian women theatre directors as an act of resistance that de-centres conventional and historical thinking. It investigates the innovations that emerge from the powerful intersection of the creative work of directing and the creative work of mothering. As identified by Throsby and Petetskaya (2017) in Making Art Work: An Economic Study of Professional Artists in Australia,1 a large percentage of theatre directors in Australia function within what is a freelance or ‘gig’ economy. At its core, the theatre industry is a low-income-earning sector that is old-fashioned in its hierarchical and male-dominated structures. This context takes a toll on the number of women who aspire to careers as directors. However, like many sectors, the balance of family life and work affects opportunities for women directors as well. While there is growing scholarship and policy on gender equality in the theatre ecology, little research has been done on directors who are concurrently doing the work of creating theatre and mothering. This article reports on research arising from my doctoral studies. It examines the significant impacts of childbearing and rearing on the way women direct and the creative work that they produce, through two case studies,2 and it further discusses key findings for creating environments that enable women directors to flourish and that facilitate new mothers’ return to rehearsal rooms across the different facets of the theatre industry.' 

(Introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australasian Drama Studies no. 80 April 2022 24768961 2022 periodical issue

    'In the first article in this issue, Julian Meyrick offers us a way of looking that seems particularly apposite in the current moment when the collateral damage from the COVID-19 pandemic to the practice and study of live performance so preoccupies us, and the way forward appears so opaque and contingent. To (perhaps grossly) simplify his far more complex assertion – that we occupy a space of both retrospective and prospective memory – the injunction to look back in order to look forward takes on poignancy in a time when we are still counting the losses in theatre scholarship and Theatre and Drama courses (particularly in Australian universities) that have been decimated in COVID-related restructures, with no clear signs regarding when or if our discipline might rebuild. And while performance venues have, on the whole, re-opened, performances or seasons are frequently cancelled as key artists contract the virus and are forced to retreat to isolation. We, as audience, have returned to witness these performances, with what Silvija Jestrovic describes as ‘an almost absurd suspension of belief, despite the all-permeating crisis which we live and breathe’.1 And, perhaps, absent a stable notion of a ‘new normal’, this condition of suspension currently conditions what Meyrick – in his article for this issue – describes our ‘capacity to imagine different futures now’. It is possible, I think, to acknowledge this positionality, or apply this useful frame, to all the articles in this issue, as each speaks out of a ‘space between’.' (Introduction)

    2022
    pg. 153-183
Last amended 6 Jul 2022 09:23:50
153-183 Director / Mother / Outlawsmall AustLit logo Australasian Drama Studies
X