y separately published work icon Queensland Review periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2003... vol. 10 no. 1 May 2003 of Queensland Review est. 1994 Queensland Review
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'This themed issue of the Queensland Review, 'Queensland: The Smart State', provides a focus on both the Smart State policy initiatives and related research on important aspects of the evolving knowledge economy in Queensland. The engagement of Queensland with the global knowledge economy is a vital issue for the state and its people. We have taken this opportunity to present an analysis of aspects of the Queensland Government policy, to provide reflections on broad aspects of the knowledge economy developing in Queensland and to open a dialogue between government and academia in this important area. The themed issue is one result of a research collaboration by the Special Editors Gillian Sullivan Mort and Amanda Roan of the UQ Business School, University of Queensland in the areas of innovation, knowledge economy, country/regional image and the policy initiatives required to sustain and enhance a country's or region's position in the global knowledge economy.' (Introduction) 

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2003 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Smart State is also Creative State : Opportunities for Queensland in the Creative Industries, Stuart Cunningham , Greg Hearn , Jeff Jones , single work criticism
'While there is increasing discussion of knowledge-based economies, knowledge-intensive firms and knowledge societies - or in Queensland's case, the Smart State - little attention has been given to rigorous and foundational social analysis of what these terms mean. Queensland is not alone in this. Research on the assumptions underpinning contemporary knowledge-related public policy from around the world (Graham and Rooney 2001) has shown that there is little evidence of such assumptions being well informed by any appropriate knowledge-related theoretical framework, and that as a consequence, basic conceptual errors in policy formulation are common. Policy prescriptions that focus on science, technology and engineering as the foci of knowledge-related public policy are common. Knowledge embodied in culture, the arts, humanities, social sciences, social skills, entertainment, spirituality and many other aspects of normal life, are not considered as central knowledge policy concerns. The implicit assumption in such a view is that knowledge only has instrumental value and only in the context of economy, industry, and commerce. Such technocratic concerns deal only with the surface features of knowledge systems. There are much deeper social, cultural and communication processes that act to bring about knowledge creation and use, as well as innovation and commercialisation of technology (Rooney et al. forthcoming). These are, however, ignored in current policy discourse surrounding the Smart State.' (Introduction)
(p. 29-36)
Note: Doesn't specifically cover the written word, but as scope increases to include things like podcasts, the implementation of interactive technologies in innovative ways may become increasingly of interest.  
[Review] Conversations on the Condamine : An Oral History from the Murray Darling Basin, Trish FitzSimons , single work review
— Review of Conversations on the Condamine : An Oral History from the Murray Darling Basin 2002 single work anthology prose ;
'Conversations on the Condamine is an eclectic book representing the work of four editors, several authors and one main interviewer; incorporating diverse disciplinary perspectives including social history and riparian ecology; and diverse institutional support. This hybridity is both the project's strength and its weakness.' (Introduction)
(p. 175-176)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 1 Aug 2019 11:19:12
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X