Tresa LeClerc Tresa LeClerc i(14118845 works by)
Gender: Female
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 Writing Sensitively : Defining Sensitivity in the Literary Sphere Tresa LeClerc , 2024 single work criticism
— Appears in: New Writing , vol. 21 no. 3 2024; (p. 288-298)

'This paper interrogates the concept of ‘sensitivity’ in creative writing. While the term appears to be relatively straightforward, the methods writers use to write sensitively differ: some may simply consider the feelings of the group represented, while others may engage with interviews or employ the use of a sensitivity reader. This paper uses complexity theory and critical race and whiteness scholarship to define and theorise how sensitivity is used within the current publishing landscape. It argues that, while writing sensitivity can offer greater opportunities for representation on the page, it can also further reinforce racial hierarchies already present within the publishing industry.' (Publication abstract)

1 The Controversy of Writing in the Voices of Others Tresa LeClerc , 2018 single work criticism
— Appears in: TEXT Special Issue Website Series , October no. 53 2018;

'There has been increasing criticism of mainstream writers who create characters from marginalised cultural backgrounds different to their own, especially when those characters are written from the first-person perspective. This can be seen as a kind of ventriloquism (Couser 1998), stereotypical and racist characterisation (Leane 2016), and lead to further oppression since the privileged person is the one who speaks rather than the group represented (Alcoff 1991). At the same time, writing that explores the migration story of people from refugee backgrounds, written by writers from those backgrounds as well as writers who have not had those experiences, has become increasingly more common (see Menchu 1984; Nazer & Lewis 2003; Eggers 2006; Cleave 2008; de Kretser 2012; Al Muderis & Weaver 2014). But there is little work on the difference between stories that have been constructed with consultation of the people represented and those that have not. A look into how novels of this kind are written can contribute to the debate of writing the other. In order to explore this concept, I wrote a novel manuscript about the everyday lives of four characters from refugee backgrounds in three drafts. The first was produced through fieldwork and observation, the second after interviews and the third through feedback. This paper compares the first two drafts of the manuscript. It suggests that prior to interviews and self-reflection, the writing followed the dominant narrative told about refugees, referred to here as ‘the national story’ (Birch 2013), which played up victimhood and played down racism. Interviews and reflection on instances of cultural misappropriation produced a story that began to counter to this narrative. This suggests that when the people represented are not involved in the writing process, the national story dramatically influences the ways in which the characters are written.'  (Publication abstract)

1 Should Writers Only Write What They Know? What I Learned from My Research Tresa LeClerc , 2018 single work column
— Appears in: The Conversation , 3 September 2018;

'As an academic in creative writing, I attend a lot of literary events. One question I can always count on being asked is, “can I write characters of other backgrounds?” This has been a growing concern since Lionel Shriver at the 2016 Brisbane Writers Festival unleashed a tirade against what she called “censorship” in writing – referring to criticism of her book The Mandibles.' (Introduction)

X