y separately published work icon Horror Studies periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2017... vol. 8 no. 1 April 2017 of Horror Studies est. 2010 Horror Studies
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

  • Contents indexed selectively.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2017 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Fault Lines in Under the Skin (Glazer, 2013) : An Ethics and Aesthetics of the ‘monstrous’, David Roche , single work criticism

'An adaptation of Michel Faber’s 2000 novel about alien invasion that updates the scifi horror tradition of the 1970s in an art-cinema mode, Under the Skin (Glazer, 2013) offers a stellar example of the ‘monstrous’ as both figure and form. Generally speaking, the interstitiality of the ‘monstrous’ demands strategies grounded in the disconnection between categories (image and sound, diegetic and nondiegetic), some of which have become horror movie clichés. Under the Skin is no exception. Its aesthetics of instability, correlated to a ‘monstrous’ figure that casts a defamiliarizing gaze on our world before attempting to ‘become human’, produces a complex subtext on contemporary alienation and identity politics, that puts the viewer in a position where he or she must both take moral responsibility for the categories he or she constructs (such as the ’monstrous’), and experience the mysterious physicality at the core of life itself.' (Publication summary)

(p. 45-59)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 7 Sep 2017 12:14:50
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X