Finch v Kentish single work   column  
Issue Details: First known date: 1835... 1835 Finch v Kentish
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

The Sydney Monitor reports on the court case Finch v Kentish, 24 February 1835. Finch was attempting to recover the sum of two hundred and ninety-four pounds which he claimed to have lent Kentish for the running of the Sydney Times. It appeared that, for a time, the two men had run the Times 'on friendly terms' but had later 'lost confidence in each other'. The judge found in favour of Kentish, deciding that the money in question was connected to a partnership (not a loan) and there was no evidence that Finch had withdrawn from the partnership.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon The Sydney Monitor vol. 10 no. 771 25 February 1835 Z1818854 1835 newspaper issue 1835 pg. 2
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()

Related Works

Untitled 1835 single work column
— Appears in: The Sydney Monitor , 4 March vol. 10 no. 773 1835; (p. 2-3) A report on two motions raised by Nathaniel Kentish in the Supreme Court, 28 February 1835, one involving reports in the Sydney Gazette and the Sydney Monitor covering the case of Finch v Kentish. Both motions were dismissed by the judge.
VIEW ALL RELATED WORKS (1)
Last amended 27 Oct 2011 10:07:20
2 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article32148337 Finch v Kentishsmall AustLit logo The Sydney Monitor
Subjects:
  • 1835
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X