y separately published work icon The Sydney Monitor newspaper issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 1835... vol. 10 no. 771 25 February 1835 of The Sydney Monitor est. 1828 The Sydney Monitor
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the , 1835 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Finch v Kentish, single work column
The Sydney Monitor reports on the court case Finch v Kentish, 24 February 1835. Finch was attempting to recover the sum of two hundred and ninety-four pounds which he claimed to have lent Kentish for the running of the Sydney Times. It appeared that, for a time, the two men had run the Times 'on friendly terms' but had later 'lost confidence in each other'. The judge found in favour of Kentish, deciding that the money in question was connected to a partnership (not a loan) and there was no evidence that Finch had withdrawn from the partnership.
 (p. 2)
To Mr Barnard [sic] Levy [sic], Conrad Knowles , single work correspondence
Conrad Knowles provides a limited explanation for his retirement from Barnett Levey's Theatre Royal.
 (p. 3)
Extracts from the Tragedy of Donohoe [Act V, Scenes I and III], Charles Harpur , extract drama (p. 4)
X