The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
Latest Issues
AbstractHistoryArchive Description
The writer for the Gazette comments on the Rev'd John Dunmore Lang's reported response to the news of William Watt's acquittal on charges of bribery.
Notes
-
Editorial comment.
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Works about this Work
-
To the Editor of the Colonist
1835
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: The Colonist , 27 August vol. 1 no. 35 1835; (p. 277) 'Crito' responds to an editorial comment in the Sydney Gazette of 22 August, particularly epithets relating to the Rev'd John Dunmore Lang in his conflict with William Watt. 'Crito', clearly on the side of Lang, concludes that Watt's conduct exhibits a 'masterpiece of impertinence and scurrility of low vulgarity, overwhelming egotism, and, intolerable assumption'.
-
To the Editor of the Colonist
1835
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: The Colonist , 27 August vol. 1 no. 35 1835; (p. 277) 'Crito' responds to an editorial comment in the Sydney Gazette of 22 August, particularly epithets relating to the Rev'd John Dunmore Lang in his conflict with William Watt. 'Crito', clearly on the side of Lang, concludes that Watt's conduct exhibits a 'masterpiece of impertinence and scurrility of low vulgarity, overwhelming egotism, and, intolerable assumption'.
Last amended 11 Oct 2011 12:02:59
Export this record
