y separately published work icon The Australian Magazine periodical issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 1859... no. 2 1859 of The Australian Magazine est. 1859 The Australian Magazine
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 1859 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
The Life and Adventures of John Leonard, a Prisoner in V.D. Land, John Leonard , single work autobiography (p. 97-110)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

Van Diemen’s Land Prisoner and Australian Magazine Captive : The Convict Autobiography of John Leonard Ruth Thomas , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Studies , vol. 1 no. 1 2009;

Van Diemen's Land transportee John Leonard wrote an autobiographical account of his experiences in the penal colony between his arrival in Hobart Town in 1835 and his pardon in 1844. His manuscript came to the attention of the editor of short-lived Melbourne serial Australian Magazine, who published excerpts from Leonard's manuscript in the Reviews section of the November 1859 issue. The article 'The Life and Adventures of John Leonard, a Prisoner in V.D. Land' is the only surviving version of Leonard's testimony. The published article records how accounts by convict authors were rendered communicable, publishable and saleable in mid-nineteenth-century Australia.

The published excerpts of Leonard's manuscript are characteristic of prison narrative in the way the author constructs an autonomous and individualised subject-protagonist. The editor who prepared Leonard's manuscript for publication, however, constructs the protagonist as entirely passive and victimised in accordance with the magazine's stated objective to illustrate the failure of transportation as reformative and rehabilitative punishment. This paper argues that Leonard's carefully crafted autonomous autobiographical subject is confined and subjugated in publication and rendered a 'narrative captive,' incapable of autobiographical autonomy within the confines of the publication apparatus.

This narrative captivity is elucidated through a close reading of examples from the published text. Three particular conditions of confinement are identified and illustrated: extensive editorial interruption and manipulation of Leonard's manuscript; editorial adherence to received modes of writing about convictism in preparing the manuscript for publication; and the editor's misreading of Leonard's strategies to recover within autobiography the autonomy and individuality denied in the experience of Van Diemen's Land convictism. The paper concludes by situating Leonard's narrative captivity as illustrative of the machinations encoded in the publication of convict narratives, in which the convict author is only one contributor. (Author's abstract)

Van Diemen’s Land Prisoner and Australian Magazine Captive : The Convict Autobiography of John Leonard Ruth Thomas , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Studies , vol. 1 no. 1 2009;

Van Diemen's Land transportee John Leonard wrote an autobiographical account of his experiences in the penal colony between his arrival in Hobart Town in 1835 and his pardon in 1844. His manuscript came to the attention of the editor of short-lived Melbourne serial Australian Magazine, who published excerpts from Leonard's manuscript in the Reviews section of the November 1859 issue. The article 'The Life and Adventures of John Leonard, a Prisoner in V.D. Land' is the only surviving version of Leonard's testimony. The published article records how accounts by convict authors were rendered communicable, publishable and saleable in mid-nineteenth-century Australia.

The published excerpts of Leonard's manuscript are characteristic of prison narrative in the way the author constructs an autonomous and individualised subject-protagonist. The editor who prepared Leonard's manuscript for publication, however, constructs the protagonist as entirely passive and victimised in accordance with the magazine's stated objective to illustrate the failure of transportation as reformative and rehabilitative punishment. This paper argues that Leonard's carefully crafted autonomous autobiographical subject is confined and subjugated in publication and rendered a 'narrative captive,' incapable of autobiographical autonomy within the confines of the publication apparatus.

This narrative captivity is elucidated through a close reading of examples from the published text. Three particular conditions of confinement are identified and illustrated: extensive editorial interruption and manipulation of Leonard's manuscript; editorial adherence to received modes of writing about convictism in preparing the manuscript for publication; and the editor's misreading of Leonard's strategies to recover within autobiography the autonomy and individuality denied in the experience of Van Diemen's Land convictism. The paper concludes by situating Leonard's narrative captivity as illustrative of the machinations encoded in the publication of convict narratives, in which the convict author is only one contributor. (Author's abstract)

Last amended 16 Feb 2011 11:40:42
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X