Is 'Flesh in Armour' Unpleasant Reading? single work   review   correspondence  
Issue Details: First known date: 1933... 1933 Is 'Flesh in Armour' Unpleasant Reading?
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

A reader responds negatively to Palmer's review of Flesh in Armour. All About Books solicits a soldier's response and that of Maurice.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon All About Books vol. 5 no. 4 13 April 1933 Z1291774 1933 periodical issue 1933 pg. 50-51
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()

Related Works

A Reader's Notebook Nettie Palmer , 1933 single work review
— Appears in: All About Books , 15 March vol. 5 no. 3 1933; (p. 38-39)
— Review of Flesh in Armour : A Novel Leonard Mann , 1932 single work novel ; Saturdee Norman Lindsay , 1933 single work novel ; Art in Australia no. 48 (3rd Series) February 1933 periodical issue ; Australia: Human & Economic A. W. Jose , 1932 single work criticism
VIEW ALL RELATED WORKS (1)
Last amended 7 Aug 2006 12:03:40
50-51 Is 'Flesh in Armour' Unpleasant Reading?small AustLit logo All About Books
Review of:
Subjects:
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X