'Kismet' Different; Quite Worth While single work   review  
Issue Details: First known date: 1911... 1911 'Kismet' Different; Quite Worth While
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

  • Review of the 1911 Knickerbocker Theatre (New York) season. It includes a principal cast list. The reviewer also questions the programme's failure to acknowledge the part Oscar Asche played in bringing Knoblock's story to the stage. NB: The critic reproduces parts of the programme in the review, with Knoblock's names being spelled 'Knoblauch'.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon New York Times 26 December 1911 Z1258219 1911 newspaper issue 1911 pg. 7
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()
Last amended 6 Apr 2006 13:24:31
7 'Kismet' Different; Quite Worth Whilesmall AustLit logo New York Times
Review of:
  • Kismet Oscar Asche Edward Knoblock 1911 single work musical theatre
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X