y separately published work icon The Weekend Australian newspaper issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 2005... 17-18 December 2005 of The Australian est. 1964 The Weekend Australian
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the , 2005 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Someone to Watch Over Me, Rosemary Neill , single work criticism
Neill talks with Julia Leigh about the impact of Leigh's mentoring relationship with American writer, Toni Morrison, and Leigh's future writing and career plans.
 (p. 6) Section: Review
Note: ports (Julia Leigh and Toni Morrison)
Jane Austen Meets Steele Rudd Amid Bolting Horses and Killer Corsets, Liam Davison , single work review
— Review of Summer at Mount Hope Rosalie Ham , 2005 single work novel ; (p. 8-9) Section: Review
Muffled Scuffles, Miriam Cosic , single work review
— Review of Timing Is Everything : A Life Backstage at the Opera Moffatt Oxenbould , 2005 single work autobiography ; (p. 10-11) Section: Review
Crime File, Graeme Blundell , single work review
— Review of Dirty Weekend Gabrielle Lord , 2005 single work novel ; Innocent Murder Steve J. Spears , 2005 single work novel ; Rubdown Leigh Redhead , 2005 single work novel ; On, Off Colleen McCullough , 2005 single work novel ; (p. 14-15) Section: Review
A Line on Rhyming Crime, Imre Salusinszky , single work column
Salusinszky examines the writing styles of John Laws and Michael Leunig who, he says, are 'possibly the two most popular poetasters at work in Australia today... [2005]'. Salusinszky claims that both poets produce 'bad' poetry - Laws's poems being 'marked by a faux-macho quality' while Leunig's are 'truly, maddeningly, deeply faux-naive.'
 (p. 40) Section: Review
X