Booker Brouhaha single work   correspondence  
Issue Details: First known date: 2005... 2005 Booker Brouhaha
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

Young defends the rules of the Booker Prize that limit entries to writers from Commonwealth nations. She is responding to suggestions by Benjamin Markovits (New York Times Book Review, 6 March 2005) that the prize should be opened up to American writers. Young contends that writers such as Peter Carey and Thomas Keneally 'would never have reached a world audience without the blessing of the Booker judges.'

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 14 Apr 2005 11:02:27
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X