The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
Latest Issues
AbstractHistoryArchive Description
A policy in two parts: Part 1. That the Union should argue the case for the importance of poetry to teachers and to educational decision-makers; Part 2. That the Union should develop and promote a presence for poets and poetry in secondary schools.
An alternative proposal, submitted by Norm Neill, is included along with Martin Langford's rebuttal of Neill's case.
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Works about this Work
-
Untitled
2005
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: Five Bells , Winter vol. 12 no. 3 2005; (p. 5) Martin Langford responds to the comments made by Louise Wakeling about his proposal for an Education Policy concerning the state of poetry teaching in secondary schools. -
Untitled
2005
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: Five Bells , Autumn vol. 12 no. 2 2005; (p. 5-6)
-
Untitled
2005
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: Five Bells , Autumn vol. 12 no. 2 2005; (p. 5-6) -
Untitled
2005
single work
correspondence
— Appears in: Five Bells , Winter vol. 12 no. 3 2005; (p. 5) Martin Langford responds to the comments made by Louise Wakeling about his proposal for an Education Policy concerning the state of poetry teaching in secondary schools.
Last amended 24 Mar 2005 15:01:21
Export this record
