'Ben stared at the images on the TV screen half in fascination, half in horror. He had never seen anything like this. It was incredible. It was awful. He needed answers . . .
There are some things Ben doesn't understand, so his dad is sent in to explain the facts of life. But it's the other facts that are worrying Ben and he decides to find his own answers. He's deadly serious - and the results are very, very funny.
'The story of one boy's stand for a better world and a slightly better family.'
Source: Publisher's blurb.
Susan is new to the neighbourhood. She makes friends at the roller rink and has to decide what she is prepared to accept and what is important to her. (Source: Libraries Australia)
In her memoir Bloodbath: A Memoir of Australian Television (Melbourne: Melbourne UP, 2006), Patricia Edgar notes that this novelisation attracted some controversy:
Hilary [McPhee] had gone along with Jan Sardi's wish to use western suburbs' language in the novelisation. By today's standards, it was tame, not extending beyond terms such as 'really pissed off', 'bitch', 'shut up, would you?', yet the book was described in the Victorian Parliament by Ian Smith, the Member for Polworth, as containing 'the worst form of gutter language'. Apart from the language, he drew attention to a description of kissing. He asked the Minister for Education 'to intervene to ensure that this literature is not made available, at least in primary schools'.
By 7 October 1985 the Director-General of Education in Victoria, Norman Curry (who was also an Anglican minister), had sent a memorandum to principals of all primary schools requesting them to 'bring to the attention of their school community the opinion of the Education Department that the book is not suitable for younger readers as the language is inappropriate'. Foundation staff tracked down the history of this memo which I sent to McPhee Gribble publishers, who were deciding what to do. Norman Curry had taken a personal interest, read the book and annotated it himself, then asked a curriculum officer, Robert McGregor, for an opinion. McGregor drafted for the Education Minister's signature a letter to Ian Smith with the same content as the memo sent to principals. No copy of the Curry memo could be found in the Department, and the English Curriculum section knew nothing of McGregor's memo and advice. It was an unusual step for such advice to be given; normally the Department keeps out of such things and leaves decisions to the discretion of the school community. [...]
I advised Hilary to so nothing. Hilary agreed. But there would be no more swearing in Foundation publications. (pp.173-74)