y separately published work icon Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (International) assertion single work   essay  
Issue Details: First known date: 1964... 1964 Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

My Double-Diaspora : Two Natures, Two Cultures and Reposing the Enduring Image of C. P. Snow’s “Bridge” Fiona Druitt , 2025 single work criticism
— Appears in: TEXT : The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs , February no. 29 2025;
'This work responds to the theme of writing from the fringes by exploring the author’s experience of being doubly-diasporic across STEM and HASS scholarship, and by relating this situation to what Bruno Latour considers “being modern” and to what Michel Foucault describes as the modern paradox. This article does three things. Firstly, this work presents a piece of scholarly writing in an academic style that rereads and rewrites C. P. Snow’s Rede Lecture on science and humanities disciplines, which Snow infamously called “the two cultures”. Secondly, this article presents a piece of creative writing in the form of autobiographical metafiction, which also rereads and rewrites C. P. Snow’s 1959 Rede Lecture, but this time, by telling the author’s own story of double- diaspora or of two natures, two cultures. And finally this article considers how its academic and creative works open onto one another to repose the question of being modern (as in poststructuralism and STS) with a view to telling the author’s story and critique of being modern in such a way that these can be heard by STEM and HASS. Some implications of this work for metafiction and for creative writing as a mode of academic inquiry are discussed.' 

(Introduction)

A Personal View of Literature and Science, 'Fin de Siecle' David Foster , 1999 single work biography
— Appears in: Studs and Nogs : Essays 1987-98 1999; (p. 56-75)
The Two Cultures Vincent Buckley , 1960 single work review
— Appears in: Prospect , vol. 3 no. 3 1960; (p. 27-28)

— Review of Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution C. P. Snow , 1964 single work essay
Buckley regards this work as 'obvious' and 'banal'.
The Two Cultures Vincent Buckley , 1960 single work review
— Appears in: Prospect , vol. 3 no. 3 1960; (p. 27-28)

— Review of Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution C. P. Snow , 1964 single work essay
Buckley regards this work as 'obvious' and 'banal'.
A Personal View of Literature and Science, 'Fin de Siecle' David Foster , 1999 single work biography
— Appears in: Studs and Nogs : Essays 1987-98 1999; (p. 56-75)
My Double-Diaspora : Two Natures, Two Cultures and Reposing the Enduring Image of C. P. Snow’s “Bridge” Fiona Druitt , 2025 single work criticism
— Appears in: TEXT : The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs , February no. 29 2025;
'This work responds to the theme of writing from the fringes by exploring the author’s experience of being doubly-diasporic across STEM and HASS scholarship, and by relating this situation to what Bruno Latour considers “being modern” and to what Michel Foucault describes as the modern paradox. This article does three things. Firstly, this work presents a piece of scholarly writing in an academic style that rereads and rewrites C. P. Snow’s Rede Lecture on science and humanities disciplines, which Snow infamously called “the two cultures”. Secondly, this article presents a piece of creative writing in the form of autobiographical metafiction, which also rereads and rewrites C. P. Snow’s 1959 Rede Lecture, but this time, by telling the author’s own story of double- diaspora or of two natures, two cultures. And finally this article considers how its academic and creative works open onto one another to repose the question of being modern (as in poststructuralism and STS) with a view to telling the author’s story and critique of being modern in such a way that these can be heard by STEM and HASS. Some implications of this work for metafiction and for creative writing as a mode of academic inquiry are discussed.' 

(Introduction)

Last amended 23 Oct 2001 12:34:54
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X