The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
Latest Issues
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Works about this Work
-
Pacific Scholarship, Literary Criticism, and Touristic Desire: The Specter of A. Grove Day
1997
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Boundary 2 , Summer vol. 24 no. 2 1997; (p. 47-78) 'In 1979, Day received the Hawaii Award for Literature. Upon his death in 1994, Day was eulogized in a Honolulu Advertiser editorial as "Hawaii's Literary Lion," to whom "Hawaii and the rest of the Pacific owe . . . a particular literary debt." The editorial concluded that Day was "the pre-eminent source" for the literature of the South Seas, as well as "a scholar and serious literary historian."' In this, Day appeared as the "literary man" in a larger project involving a variety of Pacific experts centered around the university and the Bishop Museum, most of whom took more "scientific,"less library-bound approaches, and some of whom were explicitly concerned with the preservation (if not perpetuation) of Hawaiian and other Pacific cultures. Though Day did associate with these scholars in what was a much smaller university setting (the university went from 2,500 students in 1946 to 25,000 in 1976), his literary vision has left a different legacy from the work of scholars such as Kenneth Emory (archaeology), Katherine Luomala (folklore), and Samuel Elbert (linguistics). Day's legacy has been noted by Subramani and Stephen Sumida, among others in passing, but he has received no sustained critique.' (56-57)
-
Pacific Scholarship, Literary Criticism, and Touristic Desire: The Specter of A. Grove Day
1997
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Boundary 2 , Summer vol. 24 no. 2 1997; (p. 47-78) 'In 1979, Day received the Hawaii Award for Literature. Upon his death in 1994, Day was eulogized in a Honolulu Advertiser editorial as "Hawaii's Literary Lion," to whom "Hawaii and the rest of the Pacific owe . . . a particular literary debt." The editorial concluded that Day was "the pre-eminent source" for the literature of the South Seas, as well as "a scholar and serious literary historian."' In this, Day appeared as the "literary man" in a larger project involving a variety of Pacific experts centered around the university and the Bishop Museum, most of whom took more "scientific,"less library-bound approaches, and some of whom were explicitly concerned with the preservation (if not perpetuation) of Hawaiian and other Pacific cultures. Though Day did associate with these scholars in what was a much smaller university setting (the university went from 2,500 students in 1946 to 25,000 in 1976), his literary vision has left a different legacy from the work of scholars such as Kenneth Emory (archaeology), Katherine Luomala (folklore), and Samuel Elbert (linguistics). Day's legacy has been noted by Subramani and Stephen Sumida, among others in passing, but he has received no sustained critique.' (56-57)
Last amended 15 Sep 2011 15:55:45
* Subscription service. Check your library.
Subjects:
-
cFiji,cSouth Pacific, Pacific Region,
-
cAustralia,c
Export this record
