The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
South Asia,South and East Asia,Asia,:Indian Society for Commonwealth Studies,Prestige Books,1991 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Les Murray in a Dhoti : Transnationalizing Australian LiteraturePaul Sharrad,
2011single work criticism — Appears in:
Antipodes,Junevol.
25no.
12011;(p. 39-36)'India has faced a similar challenge in establishing the serious study of its own writing in English, one made more problematic by the battle not only to overcome ingrained colonial prejudice against that writing as second-hand imitations of British literature, but because of the resistance from nationalist critics championing writing in the autochthonous languages of the subcontinent. The tactical solution amongst academics in Australia has been in part to accept the consolidation of the field in the national context and to look beyond the national to historical complex networks of literary production and circulation under Empire and to current networks of diasporic movements in and out of Australia. Among other things Sharrad shares that the current calibration of research publications in Australia and the allocation of research grants threaten steadily to concentrate resources around a few key international journals and narrow interpretations of the national interest.' (Editor's abstract)
Les Murray in a Dhoti : Transnationalizing Australian LiteraturePaul Sharrad,
2011single work criticism — Appears in:
Antipodes,Junevol.
25no.
12011;(p. 39-36)'India has faced a similar challenge in establishing the serious study of its own writing in English, one made more problematic by the battle not only to overcome ingrained colonial prejudice against that writing as second-hand imitations of British literature, but because of the resistance from nationalist critics championing writing in the autochthonous languages of the subcontinent. The tactical solution amongst academics in Australia has been in part to accept the consolidation of the field in the national context and to look beyond the national to historical complex networks of literary production and circulation under Empire and to current networks of diasporic movements in and out of Australia. Among other things Sharrad shares that the current calibration of research publications in Australia and the allocation of research grants threaten steadily to concentrate resources around a few key international journals and narrow interpretations of the national interest.' (Editor's abstract)
The Commonwealth Review
vol.
2
no.
1-2
1990-1991
Z821164
1990-1991
periodical issue
