Advertiser Printing Office Advertiser Printing Office i(A75992 works by) (Organisation) assertion (a.k.a. Wagga Wagga Advertiser Printing Office)
Born: Established: Wagga Wagga, Wagga Wagga area, Riverina - Murray area, New South Wales, ;
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 y separately published work icon Songs for Soldiers Don Westcroy , Adelaide : Frank Cork , 1940-1949 Z1415670 1940-1949 selected work poetry
1 1 y separately published work icon The Butcher-Baronet; Or, A Travestie of the Titchbourne Case The Butcher-Baronet; Or, The Wagga Wagga Mystery : A New and Original Musical Burletta in Three Acts Frank Hutchinson , Wagga Wagga : Advertiser Printing Office , 1871 Z1045599 1871 single work musical theatre burlesque humour

Described variously as a burletta, burlesque, and travestie, The Butcher Baronet draws many of its incidents from the famous trial instigated in an attempt to determine an Australian butcher's claim the Tichborne baronetcy. Hutchison's narrative, which is said to burlesque only those characters actually involved in the case, begins in Wagga Wagga (New South Wales). Act 2 sees the claimant in London where he meets members of the English aristocracy (the class that he is attempting to join), before returning once again to Australia. Act 3 involves the trial.

The Sydney Morning Herald theatre critic was seemingly impressed by the work overall, writing, 'Mr Charles Young, as the claimant, kept the audience in a continual titter throughout the performance.... The trial scene is, perhaps, the best in the burlesque, and the audience seemed to thinks so. The examination of the claimant by Serjeant [sic] Bawlaway (Mr J. H. Rainford), and cross-examination by Sir John Collarina (Mr W. Andrews) was very funny, and elicited roars of laughter... [while] the proceedings of Sir W. Snuffie, as chief justice (Mr J. J. Welsh) also proved very amusing. This scene is alone worth witnessing... With few exceptions the burlesque throughout went well [though] much more could be made of it were the stage accessories more complete' (17 June 1872, p.5).

Although the burlesque was said to have been disadvantaged, coming as it did 'at a time when the excitement about the great trial [was] almost at an end' (Sydney Morning Herald 17 June 1872, p.5), the producers publicly expressed their surprise at the lack of interest in the story by local authors. An advertisement placed in the Sydney Morning Herald reads, 'It is remarkable that, while English writers have taken for the groundwork of so many plays, pantomimes and songs the incidents of this case, Australia has hitherto had no tale, burlesque or play founded upon them. This despite the fact that 'the claimant passed a considerable portion of his life in this colony' (12 June 1872, p.10).

The production contained incidental music and also featured several songs and dance numbers.

X