Cirrus@Austlit

'Eleanor Hogan’s Into the Loneliness is a detailed and engaging biographical work. It will be of great interest to academic and professional historians – and members of the wider public – concerned with twentieth-century Australian cultural history and the settler-colonial inheritance in (and beyond) Australia. As well as being an important addition to the literature on Daisy Bates, Hogan’s book makes two other, major contributions: it represents the most comprehensive piece of biographical research on journalist and travel writer, Ernestine Hill; it is also the most thoroughgoing appraisal of the nature, circumstances and products of the collaboration between Bates and Hill (which produced the ‘My Natives and I’ articles and The Passing of the Aborigines).' (Introduction)

The naturalisation of the Australian continent and its imaginary closure have long formed an important component of Australia’s culture of nationalism. This spatial dimension has been bound up with, but analytically separable from, figurations of Australian identity which were dependent upon imposing racialised boundaries. The culture of Australian nationalism thus depends in its formation upon exemplary instances of an “island-continental” perspective in some of its most prized narratives. This article turns to a specific moment in the cultural history of Australian nationalism—at the end of the interwar period—to examine some influential narratives that construct such a perspective. It analyses elements in two historical novels, Eleanor Dark’s The Timeless Land and Ernestine Hill’s My Love Must Wait, which appeared in 1941, as war in the Pacific loomed. By addressing Dark and Hill’s parallel projects, it will elaborate on how this nationalist spatial imaginary mediates an Australian national modernity that is also about difference and distinction from its metropolitan models. This is a project of worlding the nation, creating in narrative a meaningful background for spatial politics. These novels show us how Australian modernity finds a point of difference precisely in what Suvendrini Perera refers to as the “massivity” of the island-continent, Australia. [From the journal's website]