Issue Details: First known date: 2014... 2014 Is Burchett a Traitor to Australian Journalism? A Cultural Historiographical Approach to Why This May Not Matter
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

More than 25 years after his death, Wilfred “Peter” Burchett continues to excite debate. He is a figure that, as historian Robert Manne notes, is possibly “the most controversial and influential communist in Australian history” (Manne 32). To many, Burchett is a traitor, but to others, he stands as a representation of Australian journalism’s Enlightenment-informed value and belief system. This article offers a theoretical and methodological cultural-historiographical framework within which it is possible to reinterpret Burchett as an allegorical narrative. This reinterpretation suggests Burchett can be read as a metaphor and, as such, continues to have a fundamentally essential position within Australian journalism culture, despite apparent uncomfortable “realities”. [From the journal's webpage]

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 16 Feb 2016 07:35:45
http://www.easa-australianstudies.net/node/365 Is Burchett a Traitor to Australian Journalism? A Cultural Historiographical Approach to Why This May Not Mattersmall AustLit logo Journal of the European Association for Studies of Australia
X