Issue Details: First known date: 2014... 2014 After Romanticism, Psychoanalysis and Postmodernism : New Paradigms for Theorising Creativity
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'While Romanticism, psychoanalysis and postmodern theory have provided the dominant paradigms for understanding creativity in the humanities in the past century, this paper argues that interdisciplinary engagement with sociobiology and the cognitive sciences might provide ground-breaking perspectives. Against the ‘supra-rational’, masculinist and solipsistic visions of creativity that have prevailed, the work of the sociobiologist Ellen Dissanayake and of the neuroscientist Antonio Damasio invite new ways of thinking about the role of the feeling body, femininity and mutuality in creative practice. This paper will survey Dissanayake’s and Damasio’s research to explore the possibility and desirability of a paradigm shift when it comes to understanding creativity, with poetry as a strategic focus for its argument. This paper is not interested in putting forward a new methodology for writing poetry but in recognising the embodied condition from which all poetry fundamentally arises.' (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 29 Aug 2024 11:31:37
https://textjournal.scholasticahq.com/article/27307-after-romanticism-psychoanalysis-and-postmodernism-new-paradigms-for-theorising-creativity After Romanticism, Psychoanalysis and Postmodernism : New Paradigms for Theorising Creativitysmall AustLit logo TEXT : The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing
X