image of person or book cover 4277082950025519904.jpg
Advertisement, The Mail [Adelaide], 27 May 1916, p.6
form y separately published work icon If the Huns Came to Melbourne single work   film/TV  
Issue Details: First known date: 1916... 1916 If the Huns Came to Melbourne
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'What would happen if by any means a German army should land in Australia? The question is not very difficult to answer, if one imagines the nameless horror perpetrated on helpless Belgians and Poles in the name of Kultur. Think for a moment of a repetition of the dreadful nightmare here in Adelaide! Picture those nearest and dearest to you at the mercy of the merciless Hun! Think of the un-dreamed-of possibilities, of the remorseless and wanton destruction of our beautiful cities! Imagine our beautiful public buildings, our stately churches, our treasured squares and gardens laid in smoking ruins! That is what the producer of a remarkable moving picture, entitled "If the Huns came to Melbourne" have [sic] set out to bring in a vivid manner before our eves. The result is a pictorial achievement that Australia may well be proud of. Every incident has been carefully thought out and faithfully reproduced. It teems with surprises, thrills, and sensations.'

Source:

'If the Huns Came to Melbourne!', The Advertiser, 29 May 1916, p.6.

Exhibitions

7563031
7562457

Notes

  • That the film was purest propaganda was no secret: contemporary newspaper reports included information such as 'It was screened privately for the Minister of Defence (Senator Pearce), who expressed his hearty approval, and remarked that it should be a powerful factor to help the recruiting movement.' ('If the Huns Came to Melbourne, The Advertiser~, 29 May 1916, p.6).

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

Anzac's 'Others' : 'Cruel Huns' and 'Noble Turks' Antje Gnida , Catherine Simpson , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Diasporas of Australian Cinema 2009; (p. 93-102)

'War films are not an obvious starting point to discuss Australia's diasporic cinema. Nevertheless, portrayals of the enemy draw attention to the nationalizing discourses which serve to maintain an assimilationist model of the nation. While neither German nor Turkish identities figure prominently in Australia's contemporary multicultural cinema, these national 'types' play a more significant role in Australian visual culture produced in the first part of the twentieth century. German, and to a lesser extent Turkish, villains feature in numerous films produced in Australia during both world wars. In this chapter, we argue that in the short term Australian film portrayals of the 'the cruel Hun' and 'noble Turk' encouraged glorification of soldiers in Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC), while in the long term these perpetuated a more nationalistic construction of the Anzac legend' (Publication abstract)

Anzac's 'Others' : 'Cruel Huns' and 'Noble Turks' Antje Gnida , Catherine Simpson , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Diasporas of Australian Cinema 2009; (p. 93-102)

'War films are not an obvious starting point to discuss Australia's diasporic cinema. Nevertheless, portrayals of the enemy draw attention to the nationalizing discourses which serve to maintain an assimilationist model of the nation. While neither German nor Turkish identities figure prominently in Australia's contemporary multicultural cinema, these national 'types' play a more significant role in Australian visual culture produced in the first part of the twentieth century. German, and to a lesser extent Turkish, villains feature in numerous films produced in Australia during both world wars. In this chapter, we argue that in the short term Australian film portrayals of the 'the cruel Hun' and 'noble Turk' encouraged glorification of soldiers in Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC), while in the long term these perpetuated a more nationalistic construction of the Anzac legend' (Publication abstract)

Last amended 8 Jul 2014 14:37:42
Settings:
  • Melbourne, Victoria,
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X