Issue Details: First known date: 2014... 2014 The Subject Supposed to Read : The Case against the E-reader
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'This article has grown out of a debate generated by the publication of my essay titled ‘The Obscure Object of E-reading Desire’ as a blog entry on the literary journal Overland’s website on 31 October 2011 (Alizadeh). The essay proposed that, far from enhancing readerships and reading practices, the e-reader and other e-reading devices manufactured by a range of IT companies may in fact result in a decline in reading and could, in the words of my essay, ‘turn us into worse readers’. Following the publication of the essay, and in addition to receiving a number of replies in the blog’s comment thread, the theses of my essay were countered by Dr Jennifer Mitchell in her piece, ‘Writing and Reading in the Age of the Thrilling Unknown’, in which she depicted my proposal as one characterised by a ‘fear’ of technological progress, apparently similar to a nineteenth-century Romantic’s fear of the railways (Mitchell).' (Author's introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 8 Dec 2014 10:21:14
http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-10116-20140622-0005-www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2014/alizadeh.html The Subject Supposed to Read : The Case against the E-readersmall AustLit logo Australian Humanities Review
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X