Feeling, Affect, Exposure : Ethical (In)capacity, the Sympathetic Imagination, and J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 2013... 2013 Feeling, Affect, Exposure : Ethical (In)capacity, the Sympathetic Imagination, and J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'This essay considers the role of feeling and affect in theories of the sympathetic imagination through readings of Martha Nussbaum, Geoffrey Hartman, and J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace. I explore how the sympathetic imagination is irreducibly contaminated by unstable affective states that threaten its viability as a humanist ethic. (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Mosaic vol. 46 no. 4 December 2013 6877104 2013 periodical issue 2013 pg. 1-19
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()
Last amended 7 Jan 2014 08:36:47
1-19 Feeling, Affect, Exposure : Ethical (In)capacity, the Sympathetic Imagination, and J.M. Coetzee's Disgracesmall AustLit logo Mosaic
Subjects:
  • Disgrace J. M. Coetzee , 1999 single work novel
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X