y separately published work icon New Writing periodical issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 2024... vol. 21 no. 1 2024 of New Writing est. 2004 New Writing
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'When in the 17th Century Edward Shin Yentre and Millicent Caracaccio unknowingly and almost simultaneously invented creative writing neither expected it to last. The notion of it, by its very nature, was preposterous and even more so in a century in which electricity and calculus were invented and gravitation discovered. And yet, somehow, a hundred years passed, and it was still around. The Age of Enlightenment, the Scientific Revolution, Imperialism, Rationalism – none of these could shift it. So still it persisted. In 1876 the world’s first phone call did nothing to dislodge its popularity. In fact, if anything it enhanced it. And when in 1878 electric light was invented it shed enough light on paper and quills that it set in motion the invention of the fountain pen and, subsequently, the ballpoint, which followed. Both empowered the fatuous scourge of creative writing.' (Graeme Harper : An Agreeable  Crest: The New Writing 20th Anniversary Year')

Notes

  • Contents indexed selectively.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2024 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
What Are You Doing It for? Realist Writing – The Riddled Boundary That Divides Fiction and Reality, Julia Prendergast , single work criticism

'In this essay, I respond to Australian author Charmian Clift’s question about writing: ‘what are you doing it for?’ (Wheatley 2022, 291). This question is the title of one of Clift’s essays, from a collection of narrative-driven essays, written for the Women’s Pages of The Sydney Morning Herald, after Clift’s return to Australia in 1964. I consider the similarities between realist fiction and writing that (by classification) purports to bear a closer allegiance to the author’s autobiographical life. I understand realist writing to be a representation of living | memory – the complicated and multi-faceted nature of our interior selfhood. This essay reflects my preoccupation with the cartwheels of our inner consciousness as it relates to what-I-write | how-I-write | why-I-write, and how we engage with the work of others, both writers we know in the everyday, and writers we ‘know’ through the page. I consider the act of producing narrative as a sensate response to enigma, a creative response to rumination and (perhaps) an antidote to ongoing rumination – shirking the discussion about autobiography in favour of a discussion about impetus – considering writing as a reflection upon the operations (and inherent conundrums) of an interior consciousness.' (Publication abstract)

(p. 38-55)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 5 Mar 2024 12:23:22
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X