Issue Details: First known date: 2023... 2023 [Review] Indigenous Peoples and the Second World War
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'In Indigenous Peoples and the Second World War R. Scott Sheffield and Noah Riseman have crafted a detailed comparative study of Indigenous peoples – Native Americans of the United States, First Nations peoples of Canada, the Māori people of New Zealand and the Indigenous peoples of Australia and the Torres Strait Islands – and their military service during World War II. As one can imagine, each community’s participation in the war was rich and varied, but as Tom Holm emphasises in his foreword, ‘their experiences before, during and following their return home were remarkably similar’ (xi).'  (Introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australian Historical Studies vol. 54 no. 1 2023 25906751 2023 periodical issue

    'Until World War II provoked a major rethinking of Australian federalism, the working relationships between the national and State levels of the Australian state evolved as a series of solutions to particular problems facing Australia, such as stopping the spread of influenza and ameliorating war veterans’ poverty. In this issue we publish two articles that continue this theme of ‘intergovernmental relations’. Mark Finnane takes us back to the High Court decision known as ‘Smithers’ (1913) in order to reveal how constitutional lawyers, before and after that case, considered the authority of a State of Australia. Could New South Wales police prevent a criminal from entering from another State? On one view, federation (Sections 92 and 117 of the Australian constitution) had ended or weakened such State power, and yet the federal compact had not given a ‘police power’ (or a police force) to the national government. As Finnane shows, one issue in this debate was the scope of ‘police power’. Among Australian jurists who had been following the development of constitutional law in the United States, ‘police power’ referred to the ‘fundamental responsibilities of State governments to protect the health and welfare of their populations’. Future emergencies are likely to recreate public mandates for States to wield authority so broadly conceived, Finnane concludes.' (Publication summary)

    2023
    pg. 163-164
Last amended 15 Mar 2023 10:53:32
163-164 [Review] Indigenous Peoples and the Second World Warsmall AustLit logo Australian Historical Studies
Review of:
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X