Issue Details: First known date: 2022... 2022 Oppression and Allyship in Australia's Deaf Arts
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Research in the field of disability arts to date has understandably focused on the right to education, employment, self-representation, and the right to access the arts industry afforded under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD Article 30). Achieving universal access requires a move beyond the medical model, which casts disability as a cognitive or corporeal deficit, to be cured, accommodated, assimilated and/or tolerated in mainstream society. Mainstream arts production models need to embrace d/Deaf and disabled artists as a cultural group with shared identities, beliefs, behaviours and discourses, based on a shared experience of social oppression, and a shared desire to tell stories in their own way and on their own terms. Non-disabled policy-makers, managers, administrators, directors, playwrights and colleagues can play a pivotal role in supporting d/Deaf and disabled artists and arts workers to exercise their right to participate in a range of roles the arts industry.' (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australasian Drama Studies no. 80 April 2022 24768961 2022 periodical issue

    'In the first article in this issue, Julian Meyrick offers us a way of looking that seems particularly apposite in the current moment when the collateral damage from the COVID-19 pandemic to the practice and study of live performance so preoccupies us, and the way forward appears so opaque and contingent. To (perhaps grossly) simplify his far more complex assertion – that we occupy a space of both retrospective and prospective memory – the injunction to look back in order to look forward takes on poignancy in a time when we are still counting the losses in theatre scholarship and Theatre and Drama courses (particularly in Australian universities) that have been decimated in COVID-related restructures, with no clear signs regarding when or if our discipline might rebuild. And while performance venues have, on the whole, re-opened, performances or seasons are frequently cancelled as key artists contract the virus and are forced to retreat to isolation. We, as audience, have returned to witness these performances, with what Silvija Jestrovic describes as ‘an almost absurd suspension of belief, despite the all-permeating crisis which we live and breathe’.1 And, perhaps, absent a stable notion of a ‘new normal’, this condition of suspension currently conditions what Meyrick – in his article for this issue – describes our ‘capacity to imagine different futures now’. It is possible, I think, to acknowledge this positionality, or apply this useful frame, to all the articles in this issue, as each speaks out of a ‘space between’.' (Introduction)

    2022
    pg. 304-332
Last amended 6 Jul 2022 09:37:20
304-332 Oppression and Allyship in Australia's Deaf Artssmall AustLit logo Australasian Drama Studies
X