'This paper interrogates the humanist commitment in pedagogical ideas circulating around the act of creating character and the related judgements which underlie workshop criticism. It considers how many pedagogical texts, and much practice, reinforce the centrality of an individual subject who is separate not only from objects and environment, but from other subjects: technological, human and nonhuman. Whilst acknowledging the challenge to these notions already arising from the textuality of postmodernism it questions the theory of character these challenges have produced and considers what a posthuman theory of character might look like, drawing on Donna Haraway’s notion of humanity as ‘compost’ and utilising The Overstory by Richard Powers as an example. The paper considers how student writers could be encouraged to move beyond humanist notions of the individual and to write into the connected realm of the posthuman.' (Publication abstract)
Without character, there is no story. (Bell 2019, 91)
We must believe in our characters as living breathing humans. If we don’t then how can we possibly expect our readers to? (Perabo 2019, 97)
A great deal of nonsense is written every day about characters in fiction, from the side of those who believe too much in character and from the side of those who believe too little. (Wood 2008, 79)
As soon as create an imaginary being, a character, you are automatically confronted by the question: What is the self? (Kundera 1988, 23)