Issue Details: First known date: 2019... 2019 [Review] J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression : A Reconsideration of Metalepsis
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Alexandra Effe's J.M Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression: A Reconsideration of Metalepsis is a timely contribution to the fields of Coetzee studies, narratology, contemporary literature and literary theory. Effe refocuses Coetzee criticism – recently dominated by the availability of archival material at the Harry Ransom Centre which is discussed in studies, such as David Attwell's J.M. Coetzee and the Life of Writing: Face to Face with Time (2015) – to consider his published texts as a site of dialogue. Her study unites ethical and narratological concepts to broaden a critical understanding of metalepsis – a rhetorical phenomenon of boundary transgression. Metalepsis is shown to generate tensions and uncertainties in Coetzee's works, thus exemplifying ethical impact as contingent on a dialogic process of communication between author and reader.'  (Introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon English Studies vol. 100 no. 3 2019 16840072 2019 periodical issue 2019 pg. 367-369
Last amended 20 Jun 2019 11:20:23
367-369 [Review] J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression : A Reconsideration of Metalepsissmall AustLit logo English Studies
Subjects:
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X