Issue Details: First known date: 2017... 2017 Saying and the Interruption of the Said : Ethical Considerations in and on J.M. Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Using J.M. Coetzee's The Lives of Animals (Coetzee 1999) as a basis, our article compares the straightforward ethical reading of literature as an unproblematic means for creating reader sympathy (as exemplified by the work of Martha Nussbaum), with an approach based on Emmanuel Levinas's sense of otherness. For Levinas, reading involves an awareness of otherness that does not control or circumscribe the other, but that encourages a continual unfolding of its possibilities. In this connection, he distinguishes between the “said”, that which is complete, written down once and for all, and the “saying”, that which can “interrupt” our readerly assumptions by revealing the presence of otherness. The sense of otherness, because so fundamental to our interaction with the world, needs to be respected, our ethical obligation or responsibility towards it acknowledged. We believe The Lives of Animals fosters such a sense of obligation. It both thematises moral concerns and helps enact moral understanding, unlike a straightforward sympathetic approach, which depends on exclusionary opposition at the expense of a more knowing engagement with otherness.'  (Introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 9 Nov 2017 09:39:58
97-115 Saying and the Interruption of the Said : Ethical Considerations in and on J.M. Coetzee’s The Lives of Animalssmall AustLit logo Journal of Literary Studies
Subjects:
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X