The Structure of Gooniyandi Narratives single work   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 1987... 1987 The Structure of Gooniyandi Narratives
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'The familiar Cenfralian art style, which reaches its peak in the so called "Papunya style", typically displays concentric circles, joined by lines. Most of us have heard an artist describe the meaning of his painting in terms of the movement of mythical beings between places (usually waterholes), which are represented by the concentric circles, along paths represented by the interconnecting lines. At various points along the journey things happen: secret/sacred corroborees or ceremonies are held, other groups of beings are met, and/or conflicts of various sorts take place. Those familiar with Aboriginal story telling practices will recognize this as quite characteristic of the organisation of their mythological narratives. Narratives in traditional languages of the Kimberley, the Centre (Michaels 1986:48, Munn 1973:132, Myers 1986:54, 59, 68, 69) and Arnhem Land (Williams 1986:37) - and quite likely elsewhere - normally follow the movement of people from (named) place to named place, recounting their experiences along the way. Indeed, this mode of organisation seems to be so characteristically Aboriginal that it is also found in non-mythological narratives from a variety of genres, and even in narratives spoken in Kriol and Aboriginal English.'  (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australian Aboriginal Studies no. 2 1987 11959313 1987 periodical issue

    'It is with some reluctance that I write an Editorial on the subject of the repainting of Wandjina rock art sites (see paper by Mowljarlai and Peck in this issue). The reluctance stems from the feeling that this is one of those classic cases in Aboriginal affairs where all answers (or no answers) are right. In addition, as is frequently the situation in such cases, even my right to comment will be questioned. In fact this latter aspect goes right to the heart of the matter.' (Editorial introduction)

    1987
    pg. 20-28
Last amended 28 Sep 2017 07:47:54
20-28 The Structure of Gooniyandi Narrativessmall AustLit logo Australian Aboriginal Studies
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X