y separately published work icon Horror Studies periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2010... vol. 1 no. 2 November 2010 of Horror Studies est. 2010 Horror Studies
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

  •  Contents indexed selectively.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2010 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Time Is Wasting : Con/sequence and S/pace in the Saw Series, Steve Jones , single work criticism

'Horror film sequels have not received as much serious critical attention as they deserve this is especially true of the Saw franchise, which has suffered a general dismissal under the derogatory banner Torture Porn. In this article I use detailed textual analysis of the Saw series to expound how film sequels employ and complicate expected temporal and spatial relations in particular, I investigate how the Saw sequels tie space and time into their narrative, methodological and moral sensibilities. Far from being a gimmick or a means of ensuring loyalty to the franchise (one has to be familiar with the events of previous episodes to ascertain what is happening), it is my contention that the Saw cycle directly requests that we examine the nature of space and time, in terms of both cinematic technique and our lived, off-screen temporal/spatial orientations.' (Publication abstract)

(p. 225-239)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 7 Sep 2017 11:57:21
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X