Issue Details: First known date: 2016... 2016 Cultural Precedents for the Repatriation of Legacy Song Records to Communities of Origin
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Repatriation of song recordings from archives and private collections to communities of origin is both a common research method and the subject of critical discourse. In Australia it is a priority of many individual researchers and collecting institutions to enable families and cultural heritage communities to access recorded collections. Anecdotal and documented accounts describe benefits of this access. However, digital heritage items and the metadata that guide their discovery and use circulate in complex milieus of use and guardianship that evolve over time in relation to social, personal, economic and technological contexts. Ethnomusicologists, digital humanists and anthropologists have asked, what is the potential for digital items, and the content management systems through which they are often disseminated, to complicate the benefits of repatriation? How do the 'returns' from archives address or further complicate colonial assumptions about the value of research? This paper lays the groundwork for consideration of these questions in terms of cultural precedents for repatriation of song records in the Kimberley. Drawing primarily on dialogues between ethnomusicologist Sally Treloyn and senior Ngarinyin and Wunambal elder and singer Matthew Dembal Martin, the interplay of archival discovery, repatriation and dissemination, on the one hand, and song conception, song transmission, and the Law and ethos of Wurnan sharing, on the other, is examined. The paper provides a case for support for repatriation initiatives and for consideration of the critical perspectives of cultural heritage stakeholders on research transactions of the past and in the present.' (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australian Aboriginal Studies no. 2 2016 10864998 2016 periodical issue

    'We begin by acknowledging the work of retiring AIATSIS Chief Executive Officer Russell Taylor AM. During Russell’s time in charge, the AIATSIS collection was assessed as being of great value globally as a unique and important resource. Looking forward, Russell achieved a doubling of base funding, which will assist in the next stage of vital work at the Institute. At a personal level, Russell set an example as a generous and nurturing supporter of community-based and engaged research.

    This edition of the journal continues the important work of publishing the latest ethical, engaged research that shares the beauty and value of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander life and knowledge while dealing with social and cultural issues. There are four Aboriginal authors and one Māori author across the eight articles. They share authorship in the articles and are full participants in the articles that are about them, as well as the broader categories of ‘Aboriginal’ and ‘indigenous’.' (Bamblett, Lawrence and Strelein, Lisa. Australian Aboriginal Studies, No. 2, 2016: 1-2 )

    2016
    pg. 94-103
Last amended 5 Oct 2017 10:14:20
94-103 Cultural Precedents for the Repatriation of Legacy Song Records to Communities of Originsmall AustLit logo Australian Aboriginal Studies
X