y separately published work icon Australasian Chronicle newspaper issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 1843... vol. 4 no. 540 22 April 1843 of The Australasian Chronicle est. 1839-1843 Australasian Chronicle
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the , 1843 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
The 'Observers' Libel Case, single work column

Report by the Australasian Chronicle of the outcome of a second trial for libel over the publication of an article 'The Late Executions for Piracy' which was published in the Colonial Observer, 30 November 1842.

Both trials, in January and April 1843, were reported in the Sydney newspapers of the time in articles and letters.

Not all columns and correspondence on the two trials either in the Australasian Chronicle or in other newspapers are indexed separately in AustLit.

(p. 2)
Untitled, John H. Baillie , single work correspondence

In 1842 the Attorney General charged Edward Alcock, printer and publisher of the Colonial Observer newspaper, with publishing a libel against the administration of justice in the colony. The libel appeared in an article 'The Late Executions for Piracy' published in the Colonial Observer (30 November, 1842): 641.

There were two trials in January and April 1843 which were reported in the Sydney newspapers of the time in articles and letters.

Parts of the charges were whether the defendant (Edward Alcock) was actually the printer and publisher of the Colonial Observer. As this correspondence (referring to a previous Australasian Chronicle report on the trial) shows, the Observer was careful to keep the name of John Dunmore Lang separate from the ownership or publishing functions of the newspaper.

Not all columns and correspondence on the two trials are indexed separately in AustLit

(p. 2)
X