y separately published work icon Foreign Literature Studies periodical issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 2020... no. 2 2020 of Foreign Literature Studies est. 1978- Foreign Literature Studies
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the , 2020 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
The Implications of Vegetarian Ethics in J.M.Coetzee’s Works, Jin Huaimei , single work criticism
'The identity of Nobel laureate J. M. Coetzee as a vegetarian is closely tied to his literary writing. Vegetarianism is not only Coetzee’s lifestyle, but also his major creative idea. Coetzee presents his values and ethics of vegetarianism in his work by means of personalized artistic techniques, expressing his ethical beliefs, and playing out his role as an ethical guide. His vegetarian ethics demonstrates both the care for animals and the concern for the victims of gender bias and racism. What he does in his work is to expose the bloody violence and atrocity inflicted on animals in carnivorous culture in defense of their basic and ethical right for survival on the one hand and, on the other hand, debunk the gender-based and political discourse hidden in the carnivore diet in patriarchal culture as a fierce resistance to and relentless denunciation of the gender oppression and racial violence conspired with carnivorism. Coetzee hopes that the vegetarian ethics represented in his work will inspire his readers to reflect on their relationships with animals and with other people, probe into the true nature of human being, and thereby benefit from the ethical instructions and moral admonitions. However, there seems to be some inevitable ethical paradoxes in his moral criticism on carnivore behavior and his vegetarian attitude, which we need to consider in earnest.' (Publication abstract)
(p. 110-120)
X