image of person or book cover 3525154180877243372.jpg
Image courtesy of publisher's website.
y separately published work icon Film and Nationalism anthology   criticism  
Issue Details: First known date: 2001... 2001 Film and Nationalism
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the New Jersey,
c
United States of America (USA),
c
Americas,
:
Rutgers University Press , 2001 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Australian Cinema as a National Cinema, Tom O'Regan , single work criticism

'"What does Australian cinema have in common with other national cinemas—no matter how diverse?" This chapter answers this question by establishing the characteristics of national cinemas generally through a survey of different aspects of Australian cinema. In inspecting Australian and other cinemas, I aim to generalize the shape and outlook of national cinema as a category. Like all national cinemas, the Australian cinema contends with Hollywood dominance, it is simultaneously a local and international form, it is a producer of festival cinema, it has a significant relation with the nation and the state, and it is constitutionally fuzzy. National cinemas are simultaneously an aesthetic and production movement, a critical technology, a civic project of state, an industrial strategy and an international project formed in response to the dominant international cinemas (particularly but not exclusively Hollywood cinema). Australian cinema is formed as a relation to Hollywood and other national cinemas.'

Source: Abstract.

(p. 89-136)
X