y separately published work icon CEA Critic periodical issue  
Issue Details: First known date: 2014... vol. 76 no. 3 November 2014 of CEA Critic est. 2013 CEA Critic
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the , 2014 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Garment No. 5 : The New Woman Novel and the First Maternity Clothes, K. Irene Rieger , single work criticism
'The tea gown (or, alternatively, tea-gown, tea dress, or robe d’interieur) first appeared in 1877 (Cunnington 283) and peaked in popularity in the 1890s and 1900s. The major difference between a tea gown and a regular dress was its loose fit and the fact that it did not require a corset: the bodice (the fitted portion of the gown which extends from shoulder to waist) itself might be lightly boned, and it might either have an empire waist (cinched in directly beneath the bust, thus fitting loosely over the stomach), a princess waist (having no waist seam at all, but long darts instead), or a loose belt. Because of this lack of undergarments, it was generally not worn in public or by unmarried women. According to Patricia A. Cunningham, the tea gown constituted “the upper end of th[e] class of comfortable ‘at home’ clothing” (7). The tea gown was either derived from artistic dress or from the peignoir, a sort of fancy dressing gown; there is some discussion on this topic among fashion historians.' (Introduction)
(p. 259-266)
X